Friday, January 18, 2008 at 01:12 PM

Help! The WS-* vs. REST Debate Has Been Hijacked By People Who Want To Have Logical Discussions About Actual Real World Issues!

A call to arms.

Sunday, January 13, 2008 at 07:23 AM

Speaking of, "lying through their teeth..."

Sanjiva Weerawarana is such a tool.

Monday, February 05, 2007 at 05:09 AM

WS-* == Windows Services Dash Star?

It’s that bad.

Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 03:47 PM

This word - "Web" - I do not think it means what you think it means.

Somebody pinch me; this must be a nightmare.

Friday, November 17, 2006 at 12:59 AM

The REST Dialogues

The REST / Web Arch. crowd falls back to its secret weapon in the fight for mankind: The Dialogue.

Thursday, March 17, 2005 at 01:48 PM

Web Services: what is "success" and how do we get there?

What I think success means with regards to “Web Services”.

Saturday, March 12, 2005 at 10:37 AM

What WS-* got wrong

It has nothing to do with the web.

Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 10:04 PM

Jonathon Schwartz on WS-Mess

The loyal opposition is growing in weird ways.

Tuesday, March 01, 2005 at 11:54 AM

WS-Sandwich

Some thoughts on AMQ, the latest solution to all your problems.

Tuesday, March 01, 2005 at 09:27 AM

Yahoo! Launches REST-based Web Services

Praise for Yahoo! as they launch an initial set of web style APIs.

Friday, February 18, 2005 at 05:23 PM

The Tool Vendor's Dilemma

A theory on why big vendors, big analyst houses, and the tech press want to sell you the worst possible solutions to your problems.

Sunday, December 12, 2004 at 12:30 PM

How I Explained REST to My Wife

It’s not a robot thing.

Friday, November 19, 2004 at 07:09 AM

Adam Bosworth, Sloppy KISSes, and WS-Mess

Adam Bosworth joins the Loyal WS-Opposition – minus the loyal part, perhaps.

25hoursaday.com / Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 06:12 PM

Explaining REST to Damien Katz

Dare Obasanjo is a machine.

theregister.co.uk / Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 03:55 AM

IBM Web services guru predicts WSDL future

From 2002: “On this latter specification, Sutor is emphatic: web services are defined by whether they are described in WSDL.”

bitworking.org / Friday, January 18, 2008 at 06:00 PM

Do we need WADL?

Ka-pow!

25hoursaday.com / Thursday, January 17, 2008 at 07:01 AM

Myth: RESTful Web Services Don't Need an Interface Definition Language

Dare weighs in on the usefulness of description languages in REST-based design and seems to conclude that Uniform Interface != Description Language and that simple discovery ( style) is the appropriate comparison.

steve.vinoski.net / Monday, January 14, 2008 at 05:29 AM

Lying Through Their Teeth: Easy vs. Simple

Steve Vinoski compares IDL as used w/ CORBA/DCOM with WSDL as used by WS-*. It’s interesting that IDL served as more than just a description for machines. Humans used IDL as spec text and built services accordingly, just like REST :)

dev.rubyonrails.org / Wednesday, November 21, 2007 at 12:03 PM

Changeset 8180 - Rails Trac - Trac

“Ousted ActionWebService from Rails 2.0 ” :)

25hoursaday.com / Thursday, November 15, 2007 at 11:17 AM

WS-* is to REST as Theory is to Practice

Dare talks about his transition from WS-* to REST proponent. This mirrors a lot of people’s experience, including my own.

innoq.com / Monday, November 12, 2007 at 01:25 PM

RESTafarian SOA killers?

“We (the RESTafarians) are not stubborn zealots. We’re just right. Sorry :–)”

weblog.rubyonrails.com / Sunday, September 30, 2007 at 09:01 PM

Rails 2.0: Preview Release

“… Rails has picked a side in the SOAP vs REST debate. Unless you absolutely have to use SOAP for integration purposes, we strongly discourage you from doing so. As a naturally extension of that, we’ve pulled ActionWebService from the default bundle.”

addsimplicity.com / Sunday, January 07, 2007 at 11:59 PM

WSDL - Why Services Don't Launch [addsimplicity.com]

Oh snap!

wanderingbarque.com / Wednesday, January 03, 2007 at 05:14 PM

Reinventing the WS Stack

“Should machine-to-machine, multi-hop, RESTful communications expose a need for additional functionality, then, and only then, will the need be addressed. This is opposed to the WS style of standards creation where solutions are created that go in search

infoq.com / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 at 10:42 AM

InfoQ: Interview: Pete Lacey Criticizes Web Services

Wow, I'm flattered blush Turns out I do know something about SOA after all. Speaking of “Motherhood and Apple Pie” – I quite liked that essay but it was one of those that never really took off.

atownley.org / Saturday, December 09, 2006 at 08:16 PM

Socio-political and Commercial Motivations for WS-*

Nice bit of history showing the chain of events that led to WS-*.

infoq.com / Tuesday, December 05, 2006 at 04:56 PM

Stefan Tilkov on SOA

Extremely clear and right take on REST, WS, and other techniques for distributing systems.

uddi.ibm.com / Tuesday, December 20, 2005 at 02:18 AM

IBM UDDI Business Registry: Shutdown FAQ

The first of many such FAQs and announcements…

greg.chiaraquartet.net / Monday, April 25, 2005 at 09:49 AM

PEAR 1.4.0, meet REST 1.0

Greg Beaver talks about some of the benefits of REST based design as he’s moving PEAR from XML-RPC to standrad HTTP/URIs/XML.

koranteng.blogspot.com / Tuesday, April 19, 2005 at 09:25 AM

A REST Intervention

Koranteng ponders how it is possible for REST based systems to kick so much ass.

geocities.jp / Friday, April 15, 2005 at 12:50 PM

Japanese Translation of How I Explained Rest to My Wife

How cool is that?

lists.xml.org / Wednesday, April 13, 2005 at 06:29 PM

What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?

I didn’t know SOAP/WS systems were so capable. Astounding!

theserverside.com / Wednesday, April 06, 2005 at 03:09 PM

Analyst Report: Scripting languages lag in Web services support

That’s because they don’t have shithead analyst speculation driving feature development…

sys-con.com / Wednesday, March 23, 2005 at 01:20 PM

Bowstreet Predicts 2002 Will Be The `Year of Web Services`

Just for fun :)

weblog.infoworld.com / Friday, March 18, 2005 at 10:30 AM

Don't throw out the SOAP with the bathwater

Udell wishes REST and WS-* could get along… The REST people did too – two or three years ago (e.g. Prescod, Baker).

google.com / Thursday, March 17, 2005 at 10:35 AM

Lesson's learned launching a web service

Google reflects on some of the decisions made for the AdWords API.

prescod.net / Friday, March 11, 2005 at 11:58 AM

Roots of the REST/SOAP Debate

Paul Prescod gives some background and opinion on the REST/SOAP debate.

weblog.infoworld.com / Monday, March 07, 2005 at 03:11 PM

The on-demand blogosphere

An Udell screencast on the future of the blogosphere. del.icio.us as a shared brain.. all great stuff. watch it.

peteryared.blogspot.com / Monday, March 07, 2005 at 12:02 PM

WS-Nothing

More people coming over to the loyal opposition…

xml.com / Thursday, March 03, 2005 at 12:30 AM

Show Me the Code

Joe Gregorio’s second installment in his series on building RESTful applications shows us how to build a bookmark service kind of like del.icio.us. He nailed this one really nicely.

manageability.org / Saturday, February 19, 2005 at 08:07 PM

SOAP is Comatose But Not Officially Dead!

Carlos Perez with a nice wrap up of recent WS-* vs. REST discussion around the blogosphere.

redmonk.com / Monday, February 14, 2005 at 03:13 PM

SOAP is boring, wake up Big Vendors or get niched

More reports of shrinking WS-* mindshare and cries for tools for building REST based architecture.

markbaker.ca / Monday, February 14, 2005 at 12:00 AM

The sad state of SOAP interoperability

Complexity is kryptonite to interoperability. It’s that simple.

mnot.net / Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 05:02 AM

WS-Who's-on-First

Oh, this is brilliant. Look at the bright side, Mark, at least it’s horribly useless in a way that’s interoperable!

peej.co.uk / Tuesday, January 11, 2005 at 01:20 AM

REST Intro and Overview

Paul James wrote this nice technical summary on REST and competing technologies back in September 2004 and I missed it somehow.

xml.com / Thursday, December 02, 2004 at 02:22 AM

The Restful Web

Joe Gregorio has a new XML.com column called “The RESTful Web” where he just posted his first article. This is great news. No one seems to want to stand up and bring REST to the masses.

tbray.org / Thursday, October 21, 2004 at 08:45 PM

Showing Off

:) “… it isn’t about REST or SOAP or WS-* or .NET or Java or whatever, it’s about easy.” — Tim Bray

prescod.net / Saturday, October 02, 2004 at 11:25 PM

Common REST Mistakes

Some good tips on building RESTful web services.

members.rogers.com / Thursday, September 30, 2004 at 08:45 AM

Ed, settle down. And please don't call it "WS-mess"...

… there has been a recent round of “glowing reviews from analysts”. What could possible go wrong?

bloglines.com / Tuesday, September 28, 2004 at 01:53 PM

Bloglines Web Services API Documentation

A nice, simple HTTP/XML based API for bloglines. I hope this trend continues.

mnot.net / Monday, September 27, 2004 at 09:08 PM

The ‘Web’ in Web Services

Mark Nottingham wondering why WS-Transfer (HTTP wrapped up in SOAP wrapped up in HTTP bwhhahaha) didn’t get more heat from the opposition.

eekim.com / Thursday, September 23, 2004 at 08:58 AM

SOAP Problems

A big list of problems with the current WS stack. Contains pointers to mailing-list discussion on various issues.

oreillynet.com / Thursday, September 23, 2004 at 08:56 AM

Are Web Services receding?

Simon St. Laurent noticing the recent WS-Opposition.

seanmcgrath.blogspot.com / Wednesday, September 22, 2004 at 10:50 AM

A complete guide to WS in one, short paragraph

Sean McGrath backing Tim Bray on the Loyal WS-Opposition.

tbray.org / Wednesday, September 22, 2004 at 10:43 AM

WS-Pagecount

The legs the Loyal WS-Opposition is standing on. (Tim Bray)

bitworking.org / Wednesday, September 22, 2004 at 10:40 AM

Joe Joins Loyal WS-Opposition

Joe Gregorio on Tim Bray’s “The Loyal WS-Opposition” post. This might end up being a real committee or something.

tbray.org / Sunday, September 19, 2004 at 02:01 PM

The Loyal WS-Opposition

Tim Bray on WS-Sanity: “So here’s what I’m going to do. I’m going to stay out of the way and watch the WS-visionaries and WS-dreamers and WS-evangelists go ahead and WS-build their WS-future.”